<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urgent message to the US Treasury Department</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/</link>
	<description>anythingarian bubbles and troubles from the land of the fretting nun</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles Butler</title>
		<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138892</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138892</guid>
		<description>China? Here's one reason...
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/setser/247902/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China? Here&#8217;s one reason&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/setser/247902/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/setser/247902/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138835</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138835</guid>
		<description>How about Columbia, which seems to be stirring up an awful lot of trouble at the moment? or China, where they still use slave labour?

Or is that a boycott? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Columbia, which seems to be stirring up an awful lot of trouble at the moment? or China, where they still use slave labour?</p>
<p>Or is that a boycott? <img src='http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor ap Simon</title>
		<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138834</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor ap Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138834</guid>
		<description>Manchester Guardian &lt;a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&#038;res=9A06E7DE1E3FE633A25756C0A9659C946496D6CF&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow"&gt;quoted in NY Times&lt;/a&gt; re the Asquith blockade on Germany:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The differences between a blockade and an embargo are three. First, you may blockade enemy ports, but you may not blockade neutral ports... A second difference is that a blockade is subject to well-recognized rules of international law, administered through prize courts, in which the aggrieved neutral has a right to appear. But an embargo is an act of a belligerent executive, which may or may not have a legal remedy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

They seem to have forgotten the third difference.

An embargo on Venezuela would be much braver and more relevant. Ve shall see vat ve shall see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manchester Guardian <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&#038;res=9A06E7DE1E3FE633A25756C0A9659C946496D6CF&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">quoted in NY Times</a> re the Asquith blockade on Germany:</p>
<blockquote><p>The differences between a blockade and an embargo are three. First, you may blockade enemy ports, but you may not blockade neutral ports&#8230; A second difference is that a blockade is subject to well-recognized rules of international law, administered through prize courts, in which the aggrieved neutral has a right to appear. But an embargo is an act of a belligerent executive, which may or may not have a legal remedy.</p></blockquote>
<p>They seem to have forgotten the third difference.</p>
<p>An embargo on Venezuela would be much braver and more relevant. Ve shall see vat ve shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138808</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2008/03/04/urgent-message-to-the-us-treasury-department/#comment-138808</guid>
		<description>Now where does the embargo end and the blockade begin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now where does the embargo end and the blockade begin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
