http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/ anythingarian bubbles and troubles from the land of the fretting nun Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:29:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-103879 Jodie Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:46:34 +0000 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-103879 You'll find it makes more sense if you take a step back and view pre- and post-printing styles as quasi-religious activity. You’ll find it makes more sense if you take a step back and view pre- and post-printing styles as quasi-religious activity.

]]> http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-103874 Trevor ap Simon Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:15:35 +0000 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-103874 I don't think I'm going to find anything. More fruitful probably to approach it by looking at the problems early Roman collectors faced with fakes (false idols in another guise). Printing and other forms of reproduction change the fetish from having the original object to having the only example - it's not particularly meaningful to possess woodcuts and the introduction of movable type dooms the original I don’t think I’m going to find anything. More fruitful probably to approach it by looking at the problems early Roman collectors faced with fakes (false idols in another guise). Printing and other forms of reproduction change the fetish from having the original object to having the only example - it’s not particularly meaningful to possess woodcuts and the introduction of movable type dooms the original

]]> http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-101836 Trevor Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:58:26 +0000 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-101836 Dave, who is quite shy really, points out that God wasn't really clear whether he wanted <a href="http://www.thebricktestament.com/genesis/the_flood/gn06_18-19.html" rel="nofollow">one</a> pair or <a href="http://www.thebricktestament.com/genesis/the_flood/gn07_01-02.html" rel="nofollow">seven</a>. Dave, who is quite shy really, points out that God wasn’t really clear whether he wanted one pair or seven.

]]> http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-100459 Trevor ap Simon Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:00:11 +0000 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-100459 Two's an interesting number, tho I'm very much of the "one is one and all alone and ever more shall be so" school. Two’s an interesting number, tho I’m very much of the “one is one and all alone and ever more shall be so” school.

]]> http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-100344 D Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:54:30 +0000 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-100344 The animals went in two by two, hurrah! hurrah! The animals went in two by two, hurrah! hurrah! The animals went in two by two, the elephant and the kangaroo And they all went into the ark, for to get out of the rain. The animals went in two by two, hurrah! hurrah!
The animals went in two by two, hurrah! hurrah!
The animals went in two by two, the elephant and the kangaroo
And they all went into the ark, for to get out of the rain.

]]> http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-100343 D Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:47:16 +0000 http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2007/01/03/being-or-having-the-only-one/#comment-100343 I don't think you'll find very much between Pythagoras and Montaigne. I don’t think you’ll find very much between Pythagoras and Montaigne.

]]>