/ kalebeul / 2005 / 10 / 14 / tree trivia /
David E Vassberg (Land and Society in Golden Age Castile) writes:
Hernán Núñez includes this commented variant in Refranes o proverbios en romance (ca 1549, in CORDE):
The second sentence reads, “The lives of the former two trees are but short; those of the latter two, long”. That’s roughly true: almonds and apples are rarely much use after 50 and cherries fade at 30, while walnuts may still be going strong at 100 and black mulberries–popular from Roman times–may fruit for centuries.
However, rather than simply suggesting that it is better to live on royal rather than seigneurial lands, I think the proverb–as Núñez seems to be saying–is actually instructing us to optimise asset selection on the basis of investor risk tolerance.
Almonds, for example, start to fruit at 3-4 years old and may deliver top yields by 6; they are thus an ideal crop for those who need to see a reasonably quick, safe return. Walnuts, on the other hand, may take 8 years to start fruiting and only provide maximum yields after a decade; they are the nuts of kings.
I think that Núñez’s encore–Del mal lo menos, the lesser of [several] evils–is telling us that, while choosing and planting fruit trees was a nerve-racking business for people without supermarkets or banks, even then there were fairly simple ways of working out which option would probably be least bad for one.
Trackback link.
Tell me if the spam dragon gives you a hard time. Log in if you want to be really foul.