anythingarian bubbles and troubles from the land of the sweating hun
/ kalebeul / 2005 / 04 / 27 / more tongues /
More tongues
Skip to: comments (2); categories; related posts; previous/next postRe translators and traitors, someone has sent me an example of the complex nature of medieval tongues in Caxton’s Aesop. In the tale of the palmer and the wodewose–perhaps closer to Voltaire’s ingénu than to Tarzan–the palmer first blows on his hands to warm them up and then blows on hot water given him by the wild man to cool it down, whereupon Mr Monkeyman says:
by cause that thow berest bothe the fyre and the water in thy mouthe
therfore go hens fro my pyt and neuer retorne ageyne
And the moral:
And the man whiche is wyse ought to flee the felauship of flaterers
For by flateryng & adulacion many haue ben begyled and deceyued
The anonymous Spanish version of ca 1520 is longer and less well told but adds the detail–helpful for those of a naturally cautious disposition–that
However, Spain, despite the still-pitiful state of its conjunction industry, is entering the scientific age, as we read in Juan de Arce de Otárola’s Coloquios de Palatino y Pinciano, written some thirty years later:
PINCIANO Let me tell you then that there are animals without a tongue and others with half a tongue and others with one and others with two and others with three. Crocodiles have no tongue; frogs have half, because it’s backwards, attached at the front and free at the back; men have one, the best of all, because with it they speak all languages and imitate every animal, as the philosopher Archidamos said; sea foxes [raposas marinas] have two, as I have said; women have three, because they talk with their mouth and with their fingers and heart, and their tongues are rough and sharp, like those of cats and leopards.
Four legs good, two legs bad, or whatever. However, I still haven’t come across any criticism of bilingualism in the modern sense of speaking several languages, and colonial texts mention the benefits of those so-gifted.
Trevor @ 27 April 2005 3:09 PM
Categories
Late MiddleRelated posts
- “How bilingual brains switch between tongues”
- Should beginners learn colloquialisms?
- So why shouldn’t I wet my appetite?
- Newt Gingrich: what a pillock
- Primitive languages
Previous/next post
«« Bilingual betrayal ««»» Government by orifice »»
Comments
Feeds: RSS
Trackback link.
162Tell me if the spam dragon gives you a hard time. Log in if you want to be really foul.
- Tibidabo set to music
- Spanglish, an important new literary language
- How a right-wing tree became a left-wing tree
- “Those close to the couple say they penetrate one another perfectly”
- De Juana Chaos gets something right
- Photos of egrets eating lizards
- Left/right
- How to use public service exams to screw your enemies
- “What is art in Latin countries is obscenity in the Nordic north”
- I am burning with desire to teach the Spaniards how Nordic women can love
- Bologna baloney: Barcelona student protestors are either mad or stupid
- Nerd riot
- Macbitch in Paris
- Hot chicks in Cornell
- Fines for “incorrect” language use
On Facebook, Trevor is eating saucisson de sanglier and starting to look like Obelix.
kalebeul
open source and uses Linux,
Apache, MySQL,
WordPress, PHP · Sing along with Moo Way (MP3) · 59 in 0.682
6:33 PM on 27 April 2005
I suppose ‘White man speak with forked tongue’ is a racist remark?
3:17 PM on 28 April 2005
Yep, and I also wonder who exactly Pinciano was dating.