<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hump</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2004/08/28/hump/feed/rss2/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2004/08/28/hump/</link>
	<description>anythingarian bubbles and troubles from the land of the fretting nun</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John S</title>
		<link>http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2004/08/28/hump/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>John S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oreneta.com/kalebeul/2004/08/28/hump/#comment-919</guid>
		<description>I think Nip/Tuck is inaccurately (and probably incorrectly) listed along with Banzai, Big Brother, et al. Nip/Tuck was not reality TV, but a very well observed and written drama from the US set, in a similar vein to Six Feet Under, but about plastic surgeons rather than undertakers. It strikes me that it's placement in such daming company is incongruous, and probably erroneous.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Nip/Tuck is inaccurately (and probably incorrectly) listed along with Banzai, Big Brother, et al. Nip/Tuck was not reality TV, but a very well observed and written drama from the US set, in a similar vein to Six Feet Under, but about plastic surgeons rather than undertakers. It strikes me that it&#8217;s placement in such daming company is incongruous, and probably erroneous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
