/ kalebeul / 2004 / 01 / 18 / bestiaries ii llull and orwell /
Although saying so will probably lead to bloody conflict in Europe and intermittent showers in Letchworth, Herts, it seems to me axiomatic in terms of human psychology that mythologies in which zoomorphs and humans mingle socially progressed naturally to bestiaries mirroring human behaviour, from which emerged zany zoologies like Pere Quart’s. Ramon Llull’s Llibre de les Bèsties (Book of the Beasts), dated by Ferran Gadea to the early 1280s, falls into the second category. Llull may have had such a great leap forward in mind when in chapter four he wrote:
This same expository progression from symbiosis to allegory is used in a more recent moral novel, Orwell’s Animal Farm, in which Biblical convention linking human folly and animal agency is scrupulously followed. I think it’s pretty unlikely that Orwell encountered Llull’s beasts, but embassies between the animal and the human kingdoms also form an important and unusual feature of both works. However, where Orwell despairs of the present and fears the future, Llull cheerfully champions the role of proto-Machiavellian guile in the maintenance and marginal improvement of a society that is divinely ordained. Orwell was deeply conservative, but it’s funny to think of him having been more so than a thirteenth century quasi-cleric.
) and Bowker (
) have failed to note this.Trackback link.
Tell me if the spam dragon gives you a hard time. Log in if you want to be really foul.
18 January 2004 at 6:59 PM
Ah yes, but Orwell was the worker’s friend…
18 January 2004 at 8:34 PM
Llull bought an Arab slave in order to learn the language and seems to have beaten him up when he took the Lord’s name in vain, but Orwell also beat his servants in Burma.